Showing posts with label osx. Show all posts
Showing posts with label osx. Show all posts

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Bullshit Monopolies

Thinking back from the 1990's to now...

Who FORCED anyone to buy Windows over other operating systems?  Did we not have access to buying OS/2, Mac, UNIX (one of a hundred flavors) or Linux?

Who FORCED anyone to buy Office?  Did we not have WordPerfect and later: OpenOffice?  Star Office?

Who FORCED anyone to use IE?  Did we not have Netscape, AOL, Firefox, Opera, Chrome and Safari?

Who FORCED anyone to use Google?  Did we not have Alta Vista, Excite, Lycos, Ask Jeeves, BigFoot, Web Crawler, Yahoo!, AOL and Bing?

Where the hell do these lawyers fish up people to file major law suits claiming they had no choices?  I don't get it.  I see Microsoft is building a consortium to file suit against Google search as being an unfair monopoly.  Wow.  So, apparently they've thrown in the towel on Bing having what it takes to draw customers away from Google.  I especially love it when my "free market" colleagues argue in favor of this practice, effectively admitting that a "free market" can't decide on its own and therefore requires government/legal intervention to correct bad behavior.  My how times have changed.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

FAQ – Operating Systems

Here’s my dysfunctional professional response to the most commonly asked questions about operating systems.

  • Q: Which operating is the best?
    • A: It depends
  • Q: Which operating system would you recommend?
    • A: It depends
  • Q: Why won’t you answer the question?
    • A: Because anyone that answers either of those questions with a knee-jerk answer is a complete dumbass, or they are lying or ignorant or are delusional from too much crack and cocaine use, or all four. :)
  • Q: I’m a graphic artist, musician, or audio engineer.  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: OSX
  • Q: I run a corporate network with 1000 users.  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: Windows 7
  • Q: I do movie-quality animation with 3DS Max and Lightwave.  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: Windows 7
  • Q: I’m a web designer (not web app developer).  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: It doesn’t matter: OSX or Windows 7
  • Q: I’m a web applications developer.  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: It depends.  If you’re working with ASP or ASP.NET or on a Windows web server environment, go with a Windows client OS.  If you’re working with PHP, Ruby or Flash, you can go with OSX.  If you’re only working with PHP or Ruby, you can go with Linux.  Otherwise, go with whatever floats your boat.
  • Q: I bought a Netbook and want to load the best OS on it.
    • A: Whatever floats your boat.
  • Q: I’m a movie producer/TV producer/advertising producer.  Which OS should I go with?
    • A: OSX
  • Q: I run a data center with several Oracle instances and are kind of tight on the budget side (aside from Oracle licenses and hardware).  Which OS should I use?
    • A: It depends
  • Q: …on what?
    • A: On whether you or your staff have any experience with Linux or Windows.  Whether you have time and budget for training.  Whether you have budget to hire more staff.
  • Q: …so then what?
    • A: Go with what fits your environment and staff capabilities, then worry about budget.  Because the first two will absolutely destroy your budget if the “solution” doesn’t fit.
  • Q: I just bought a Macbook/Macbook Pro and want to load it up with Linux or BSD and dual boot with OSX.  Is that cool or what?
    • A: No.  It’s not cool.  If you can make that setup do something like cure cancer, end world hunger or bring peace to the world, then it would be cool.  Otherwise it’s just another reason to not get laid.
  • Q: My CIO/CTO just returned from a conference and now wants to change all of our desktops and servers to a different OS.  What should I do?
    • A: Smack them as hard as you can on the side of their head with an open hand.  That should distract them long enough to make a clean getaway.
  • Q: I have no budget at all.  Just a pile of hand-me-down computers with no OS installed.  What should I do?
    • A: Either install Ubuntu 9.10 on them, buy some books and surf a bunch of web sites to bone-up on Ubuntu administration, or find another job working for someone with a budget.
  • Q: My friend says “<insert-name-here>” is the best OS.  Is that true?
    • A: Your friend is a complete fucking idiot.
  • Q: My friend says Windows is a virus magnent.  Is that true?
    • A: Where do I start…. hmmm… ok… is this the same friend that said <productname> is the best OS?  He’s still a fucking idiot.  Seriously though, viruses rarely come from “nowhere”.  They come from going to the wrong places, downloading the wrong things, plugging in the wrong devices (thumbdrives from other people) and generally doing stupid-ass things you shouldn’t do.  Getting a virus is like walking into the “wrong” part of town.  If you keep walking into the wrong part of town, you can claim (legally) that the town is unsafe and a mugging magnet.  Use your brain, or what’s left of it, and practice some common sense.  I’ve never had a virus on my home computers.  Never.  Not with Windows 3.11, 95, 98, NT4, 2000, XP, Vista or 7.  Never.  They have always been connected to the Internet and configured properly and I treat them with common sense.  You should too.
  • Q: My friend says OSX has no viruses and cannot be hacked.
    • A: Dump this friend already?  Nothing is “hack-proof”.  Nothing.  People make this stuff and people are flawed.  Period.
  • Q: My friend says Linux is hack-proof and has no viruses.
    • A: You need new friends.  Do we need to keep saying this?
  • Q: My friend says I can run OSX and run AutoCAD and Inventor in VMware Fusion or Parallels.  Is that true?
    • A: Good luck with that.  Let me know when you meet Elvis.
  • Q: Can Windows be made hack-proof?
    • A: I’m not talking to you anymore.  You are trying to upset my Feng Shui.
  • Q: I bought a Linksys/D-Link/NetGear/etc. wireless router and plugged it in at work.  Is this ok?
    • A: OMG.  Did you do any configuration changes to tighten it down? :(

Why I’m Done with Linux as a Desktop OS

Linux was cool for a long time.  I started with Slackware distros back in 1998, no X windowing, just CLI.  That was fine because, at that time, it handled mutli-tasking pretty well and it ran on old hardware with meager resources.

But times have changed.  Gnome and KDE have evolved to chase OSX and Windows with respect to piling on the GUI features, which is understandable.  But the aims of Linux have fallen off the wagon.  The argument used to be unified: It’s stable and requires few resources.  But then they got into the Kool Aid and began trying to copy OSX and Windows.  The “me too” stuff grew into repeated publication claims that it would “soon” replace Windows on the desktops of the world.  It never came close.  In fact, it has declined in that segment.

The only place Linux makes sense anymore is on server platforms and in small embedded devices (mobile devices, set-top boxes, appliances, industrial controls and monitoring for example).  The only segment that I would even consider it on for true “desktop” use is in non-profit environments that simply don’t have the budget for Windows or OSX.  Even then, I don’t see nearly as many non-profits hunting for hand-me-down hardware as I used to.  Most are getting new systems with Windows pre-loaded, or 2nd-hand hardware that also has Windows installed.

I don’t even fire up Linux distros in VMware anymore.  I used to feel an eagerness to stay up to date on Suse, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora, and several others.  Not anymore.  My time has become more and more limited (and precious) and, risking the sound of a PR minion: Windows 7 does everything I need and I really like the UI and automation/CLI changes.  Did they move closer to a CLI manageability state with Linux?  Yes.  Did they move closer to a UI cleanliness state of OSX?  Yes.  Did they do that intentionally?  Who knows.  Who cares.  When the patient gets up from the the table and begins to run, you don’t ask how or why.

Is Windows 7 perfect?  No.  Technically speaking, it is superior to any previous versions of Windows ever produced.  But technically I’m happy with what it brings to the table.  What I’m not happy with is the licensing and cost aspects.  They missed the mark there, and that made Windows 7 fall short of being a truly “perfect” solution for my needs.  But I’ll stick with it regardless.

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Why Can't Operating Systems be More Fun?

Like a lot of folks did during this holiday shopping season, we ventured into the mouth of the lion:  Shopping Malls.  One store I always make a point of visiting is the Apple Store at MacArthur Mall, in downtown Norfolk.  Not the coolest Apple Store, but the ONLY Apple Store within 50 miles, so it's good enough.  I usually spend about an hour there and take my time grazing over the goods like a three-legged cat sifting through a turned over garbage can late at night.

My kids were with me, as usual, and they too spend considerable time playing with the gadgets and taking mental notes.  Mind you, we don't own any Apple computer products, just a ton of iPods and an AppleTV.  I can't justify the expense when I have a housefull of PC computers already.  I still like to play with things.  I always have. But I really like to quietly listen to my kids talk about what they think of technical gadgetry.  It's hilarious and extremely interesting at the same time.

I have four kids.  Ages 18, 16, 12, and 9.  A few months ago, I reloaded their computer at home with Ubuntu and had them use it for a little over a month.  Their views were mixed.  Two of them were "ok" with it.  Two of them hated it to death.  The 12 year old didn't even notice it was Ubuntu until I asked her.  The youngest two only use a computer to play online Flash-based games and they were using Firefox at the time, so it's not that much of a difference from Windows XP or Vista.

The two oldest kids spend a lot of time at their friend's houses and use their Macs a lot.  They are very fluent with them.  The two youngest kids have been to the Apple Store enough to know how to get around in OSX actually.

They all like OSX, as do I, for having a more interesting, intuitive interface over Vista or Ubuntu.  But we would all prefer an operating system that was more customizable, dynamic, and "fun" like a video console.  This became apparent to us while playing with the Wii over Christmas.  Navigating the Wii menu system, opening games and options, watching how objects move and behave, etc.

A good example being "World of Goo", for the Nintendo Wii.  The graphics, animation and characters are really cool and a lot of fun to play with.  It's a simple game of building structures using little globs of "goo" with eyeballs, that squeak and laugh as you move around and stick to them together.  The points talley is poured into a vessel.  The intro is like the beginning of The Incredibles, or movie-like.  The cursor is a squiggly blob that looks like a slug as you move it around the screen.  Everything is fluid, dynamic, smooth, not jerky or flat or static.  

Another example they like is an artistic program called ArtRage.  The menus use a fluidic motif that melts in and out as you click on things.  Very cool.  The overall theme is clean and simple, yet robust enough to not feel dumbed-down.  A great balance between simplicity and granularity.  But World of Goo is probably the coolerest of the two as far as what features could be adapted to make an operating system more "fun" to use.





The closest things I've seen to going in that direction are Edubuntu (add-on for Ubuntu 8.10), or WindowBlinds by Stardock.  But even they stop short of really radically redesigning the interface, or more importantly, the interface behavior.  I was hoping Windows 7 would open up things for people to customize the interface experience more than XP or Vista, but early signs don't look so promising.  Vista "Ultimate" was an ultimate let-down in that regard, but that's looking to the past.  There's no reason why an operating system can't be as fun to use as a PS3, XBox 360 or Wii console.  I'm hoping the future delivers something more interesting.

Monday, June 30, 2008

FUD doesn't just survive, it Thrives!

The OS weenies are so entrenched it's like asking a lunchroom table of Kindergartener's to voluntarily give up their Twinkees for a can of brussel sprouts. Vista or OSX or Linux. Like, if you say something negative, regardless of being factual or not, invites flaming and hateful responses from any of these camps of half-brained idiots.

Paul Thurrott was drawn out to fight a losing battle as he tries to defend the merits of Vista against someone else's post spraying non-factual FUD comments. It's a waste of time. Vista is suffering from technical problems. It suffers from Microsoft's poor handling of it in general. Marketing, vendor partnerships, licensing, pricing, and corporate stewardship efforts have all been handled about as well as we've handled the Iraq/Afghanistan mess.

I still maintain that all software is crap and lives within a continuous state of refinement and updating. It's ALL BETA when you get down to it. If it were to stop changing then it could become firmware, right? That's what Babbage had in mind with the term "Soft"+"Ware" after all. But what really gets me is how the general perception is that software is somehow organic and results from natural forces. "It" is how we refer to it. As if "it" has a life and conciousness of "its" own. Wrong! Software is created by humans. And while the soul of software has eroded horribly in the past 10 years, it still remains a human creation. Humans are flawed. Terribly flawed. So the axiom flows likewise.

Operating Systems all are great, and yet they all suck too.